PragmaTechLegal
Our approachResourcesAbout
Sign in
Book a consultation

Legal compliance

Aligned with local bar requirements

Regulatory simplified

Privacy Law & GDPR (EU/Canada)

Sovereign security

Data hosted in Canada & AES-256 encryption

Document management
5 min read

Archiving: retention periods and secure destruction of files

Destroying a file too soon or keeping it indefinitely: both extremes create problems — one deontological, the other regulatory.

Destroying a file too soon or keeping it indefinitely: both extremes create problems. One is deontological, the other regulatory — and both can cost a Quebec firm dearly.

Keeping a file too long exposes personal information unnecessarily. Destroying it too soon compromises professional secrecy and accounting obligations. A firm must calibrate timelines to Barreau regulations and Bill 25.

Retention periods

The Regulation respecting accounting and trust accounts of lawyers sets minimum durations for certain accounting documents and files. The Code of ethics requires keeping files for the time necessary to properly administer the practice.

In practice, most firms retain closed litigation files for at least six to ten years, depending on mandate nature.

The exact period depends on document type — not a single rule for the entire file.

Secure destruction

  • Paper: shredding or incineration by a certified subcontractor.
  • Digital: irreversible deletion, not just the recycle bin.
  • Media: disks, USB keys and backups must be wiped or physically destroyed.
  • Log: record the date and method of destruction.

« Secure destruction must leave a documented trail, not just a vanished file. »

Bill 25 and minimization

Bill 25 requires keeping personal information only as long as necessary for collection purposes. After the period expires, destruction or anonymization is required.

The incident register must document any breach during improperly executed destruction.

Professional secrecy after destruction

Even after destruction, the confidentiality obligation persists for what the lawyer learned in the mandate. Destroying the physical or digital medium does not release the secret — it reduces the risk of accidental disclosure.

Destroying the file does not destroy the confidentiality obligation.

Primary sources

  • Code of ethics — professional secrecy and files
  • Act respecting the protection of personal information in the private sector (CQLR, c. P-39.1)
By the PragmaTech Legal team·Published March 15, 2026·Verified March 15, 2026

Go further

What PragmaLegal automates for you

  • Full file export before closing or migration.
  • Configurable retention policies by mandate type.
  • Secure deletion with traceability in the audit log.
Try free — 7 daysBook a consultation

Related articles

  • Document managementMatter management: lifecycle, retention and access
  • Bill 25 complianceBill 25: concrete obligations for a Quebec law firm
  • Document managementConflicts of interest: verification and monitoring obligations
PragmaTechLegal
PragmaLegal · logiciel de gestion

PragmaTech Legal — technology consulting and software solutions for Canada's legal ecosystem. PragmaLegal is our practice management platform.

Consulting services

  • IT Governance & Procurement
  • Business analysis — legal sector
  • BI & Automation
  • Book a consultation

Product

  • PragmaLegal platform
  • Pricing
  • Resources
  • About

Transparency

  • Privacy policy
  • Terms of use
  • CLOUD Act & Sovereignty
  • Privacy Compliance

Contact

  • fawzi@pragmalegal.ca
  • +1 (819) 995-9126
  • Trois-Rivières, Quebec, Canada
Secure infrastructure
Regulatory compliance
Multilingual support
AES-256 encryption

PragmaTech Legal is a technology consulting firm and software publisher. We do not provide legal advice.

© 2026 PragmaTech Legal. All rights reserved

Operational systems